Leadership in a VUCA world
“Uncertainty” has become the modern catchword but recent events have only revealed a deeper truth: we always live in uncertain times. The apparent stability of 2019 seems like a lifetime away what with Coronavirus, volatile stock markets, forest fires in Australia and Brexit end-game talks uncertainty. Christine Lagarde of the European Central Bank warns of an economic correction as severe as 2008. Rate setters are slashing interest rates. Governments are placing travel restrictions between EU Schengen states. And with the US and Chinese locked in trade battles, globalisation may seem under threat.
Each day brings news that only makes the future harder to decipher: there seems to be as many meanings as there are commentators! So, what might each of those possible meanings mean for you, your industry, for the economy, for the world?
Meanwhile, the forces of globalisation and innovation march on – so our local uncertainty is combined with a growing recognition of how complex the world has become. It’s hard to cope with all the possible interactions between what we know and what we don’t know – the known unknowns and the unknown ones collide every time we try to foresee a viable strategy. No-one’s ‘industry context’ is stable – new competitors can emerge from anywhere – think Uber, Airbnb and Netflix. And the formation of supply-webs instead of supply-chains adds complex computation into our traditional ideas of competition as ‘coopertition’ emerges between former rivals.
For those of us with multiple stakeholders, much of what we see around us is not merely uncertain but ambiguous. It’s not just that we don’t know the right thing to do, there may not be a right thing to do – and we certainly can’t easily find agreement about the best way forward. There are few precedents to guide us: meanings and interpretations have yet to emerge, or are contested between different groups. Think of the apparently endless struggle to reach global agreement over action on climate change: no sooner do we appear to have reached a consensus than it comes under threat again. Will the COP26 climate talks in Glasgow this November really lead to the tough changes required to reduce emissions to net zero by mid-century? Finally, no-one can deny that the context is changing in a discontinuous and unpredictable way – we only have to look at the rapid rotation of political leaders and the almost daily announcements of new initiatives or developments that turn everything that has happened before on its head.
This new context has been summarised using the VUCA acronym – volatility, uncertainty, complexity and ambiguity. Like many phrases this can become an overused buzzword, but we are now seeing that such a context poses a twin challenge to leaders: not just to formulate strategies and immediate responses but, at the same time, to develop their own capacity to respond to VUCA conditions.
When VUCA conditions emerge – or rather, when we become aware of them – a natural human tendency is to shut down. Uncertainty grabs the social system of our organisations and this can lead to an abdication of leadership, paralysis by analysis or, often worse, a ‘strong’ knee-jerk leadership reaction in completely the wrong direction. We defer decisions until we have more data, but the more data we receive, the more complex and ambiguous the word becomes.
VUCA contexts often undermine people who have up to now been performing very well under business-as-usual conditions. They may simply shut out new data or news from the ‘troops’, denying the changing realities of the world around them and seeking refuge in the certainties of the past. Or they may simply try to ‘do the same but harder’ – putting ever more effort into the strategies that worked so well last year in the hope that graft will win through.
But other leaders seem to react differently: they see the opportunities that are opening up to develop and innovate, creating their own meanings to fill the gaps created by VUCA. Without in any way taking away from the seriousness of the situation, they create the space in which to experiment, play and explore the new possibilities that turbulence creates.
This can lead to surprising results. In the UK public sector we have seen local government bodies respond to drastically reduced ‘austerity’ budgets with an unexpected burst of creativity that has by and large maintained services. But despite the publicity given to “disruptive” new entrants and market creators – WhatsApp, Bitcoin, 23andMe, etc, as yet, it seems harder to us to identify established private sector organisations who have radically changed their game in response to VUCA to the extent that some (and not all!) public sector organisations have shifted in response to austerity. However, you will no doubt be thinking of a small number of individuals in your own industry – we would be delighted to hear your views about who these innovators are as we prepare for later articles in this series.
What enables some leaders to grasp these opportunities, rather than trying to roll back the clock to a more stable context?
We are not necessarily talking about people who are more intelligent or harder working or more creative than their peers. What we are seeing are people who have managed to progress in their own development as leaders. They have gone beyond what we might call the ‘foundational leadership’ skills which are based on expertise, solid interpersonal skills and professional achievement, to shift to a more inquiring, pattern-detecting and creative style from which they can begin to shape and question their own paradigms and those of their people.
Based on a field of theory known as ‘Adult Constructivist Development’ (sometimes known as vertical development), a set of stages of leadership development have been catalogued in a way that reflects an increasing ability to cope with fluid and complex situations. As people begin to move beyond the ‘conventional’ ways of making meaning (called ‘later stage’ thinking), new patterns of thinking and relating start to emerge.
At MDV, we have examined all of the main theories in the field and we have identified four underlying mental capacities which can be developed into the capabilities a leader needs to survive and thrive under VUCA conditions.
- Handling complexity: VUCA demands a whole new level of ‘processing skill’ from leaders at all levels in the organisation. There is so much information coming in from all directions, from the global strategic level to the impact of tricky personal relationships or organisational politics. Later stage leaders are constantly ‘upgrading’ their ability to work with complex information – if necessary building their own new conceptual maps as they go.
- Fluidity and flexibility: When the context is changing rapidly, we need to be intellectually adaptable – to continually test our existing ideas with competing new models as they emerge. In this situation, there are no right answers and Scott Fitzgerald’s maxim ‘wisdom is the ability to hold two (or more) contradictory ideas in your head at the same time without going mad’, holds true.
- Self-observation: Later stage leaders exhibit the ability to ‘keep their heads while all around are losing theirs’ and yet still be fully aware of the seriousness of the situation. Some people are naturally calm under pressure but these individuals develop the capacity to observe themselves under all sorts of conditions and learn how to better manage their own emotional state even in high stakes si